Difference between revisions of "User talk:Memm"

From Stationery Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
==Hi==
 +
Thanks for the welcome message. Happy to help out. Love the wiki idea.
 +
 +
Nice to have you here. --[[User:Memm|Memm]] ([[User talk:Memm|talk]]) 13:47, 22 November 2021 (CET)
 +
 
==Spam==
 
==Spam==
  
Line 26: Line 31:
  
 
:Dish, thank you for your great contributions! --[[User:Memm|Memm]] ([[User talk:Memm|talk]]) 16:23, 1 February 2020 (CET)
 
:Dish, thank you for your great contributions! --[[User:Memm|Memm]] ([[User talk:Memm|talk]]) 16:23, 1 February 2020 (CET)
 +
 +
:Thanks! Oh, and also thank you for correcting some of my mistakes! --[[User:Dish|Dish]] ([[User talk:Dish|talk]]) 14:08, 9 February 2020 (CET)
 +
 +
== Thanks for the welcome/sourcing question ==
 +
 +
Hello, and thanks for the account approval! I'm somewhat new to the pen world, but am loving the community and the idea of this wiki!
 +
 +
I've recently been trying to aggregate as much online info as I can on various stationery items and have a bit of a catalog accumulating on the physical characteristics/dimensions for various models. As I don't own nearly all of the items I've aggregated, I'm wondering if online retailers are an acceptable source of information related to these metrics (e.g. model #s, body material, weight, length, diameter, etc.)?
 +
 +
I should note I have no affiliation with any of the retailers I've pulled data from, however I can understand if these are not considered an appropriate source for the purposes of this database.
 +
 +
Thanks again, and looking forward to contributing however I can :) --[[User:ParkerBrothers|ParkerBrothers]] ([[User talk:ParkerBrothers|talk]]) 19:53, 10 October 2022 (CEST)
 +
 +
Hi, thanks for joining us. I completely undertsand your thinking and have similar thoughts. IMO online retailers are an acceptable source of information. If users were to measure themselves we also don't know if they did it right, so I see no issues with that. Welcome! --[[User:Memm|Memm]] ([[User talk:Memm|talk]]) 11:40, 11 October 2022 (CEST)
 +
 +
 +
Hello again [[User:Memm|Memm]]! Hope you are well and I wanted to share some info you might find useful. I've spent the past year or so collecting and organizing data into an [https://apate.shinyapps.io/pen_hierarchy_draft/ interactive product hierarchy] as a fun data project. It's not perfect and there are surely some errors woven throughout, but I have found around 11.5K unique items that I think could enhance this wiki. I'd like to seed pages for others to contribute additional info, but realize a bulk addition of this size would probably need to be organized by you. I'm happy to share [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1njMNvv3Sx3sEQD8jDpjj1Nk-gHABOUr2CdLkxQigvVY/edit?usp=sharing this gsheet link] with the hierarchy outline and org structure, and feel free to reach out if you'd like additional context! --[[User:ParkerBrothers|ParkerBrothers]] ([[User talk:ParkerBrothers|talk]]) 17:56, 4 August 2023 (CEST)

Latest revision as of 17:56, 4 August 2023

Hi[edit]

Thanks for the welcome message. Happy to help out. Love the wiki idea.

Nice to have you here. --Memm (talk) 13:47, 22 November 2021 (CET)

Spam[edit]

Hello Matthias!

I'm sorry to say, but apparently we have a spam invasion here. I'm constantly clearing new spam pages (including user pages) but I don't know if this is useful in any way. Is there anything else I can do to help get rid of this annoying phenomenon? Dish (talk) 14:46, 29 June 2019 (CEST)

I have changed your account now, see your own talk page for more information. --Memm (talk) 11:27, 9 July 2019 (CEST)
Thanks for your trust. I really hope to be useful in the future, here. And definitely thanks a lot for the instruction video: I'll see it as soon as possible. --Dish (talk) 00:52, 10 July 2019 (CEST)
Thank you for deleting and blocking so many spammers! --Memm (talk) 19:36, 10 July 2019 (CEST)
No problem: I'm happy when I can help! --Dish (talk) 15:17, 11 July 2019 (CEST)

WikiIndex[edit]

I created an entry there: [1]

IP-editing is welcome there, if You wanne improve/change it. --Manorainjan (talk) 02:14, 9 October 2019 (CEST)

Mechanical Pencil Day Contest 2019 Contributions[edit]

Thank you for updating, and adding me to the contribution page!--Dish (talk) 00:37, 25 January 2020 (CET)

Dish, thank you for your great contributions! --Memm (talk) 16:23, 1 February 2020 (CET)
Thanks! Oh, and also thank you for correcting some of my mistakes! --Dish (talk) 14:08, 9 February 2020 (CET)

Thanks for the welcome/sourcing question[edit]

Hello, and thanks for the account approval! I'm somewhat new to the pen world, but am loving the community and the idea of this wiki!

I've recently been trying to aggregate as much online info as I can on various stationery items and have a bit of a catalog accumulating on the physical characteristics/dimensions for various models. As I don't own nearly all of the items I've aggregated, I'm wondering if online retailers are an acceptable source of information related to these metrics (e.g. model #s, body material, weight, length, diameter, etc.)?

I should note I have no affiliation with any of the retailers I've pulled data from, however I can understand if these are not considered an appropriate source for the purposes of this database.

Thanks again, and looking forward to contributing however I can :) --ParkerBrothers (talk) 19:53, 10 October 2022 (CEST)

Hi, thanks for joining us. I completely undertsand your thinking and have similar thoughts. IMO online retailers are an acceptable source of information. If users were to measure themselves we also don't know if they did it right, so I see no issues with that. Welcome! --Memm (talk) 11:40, 11 October 2022 (CEST)


Hello again Memm! Hope you are well and I wanted to share some info you might find useful. I've spent the past year or so collecting and organizing data into an interactive product hierarchy as a fun data project. It's not perfect and there are surely some errors woven throughout, but I have found around 11.5K unique items that I think could enhance this wiki. I'd like to seed pages for others to contribute additional info, but realize a bulk addition of this size would probably need to be organized by you. I'm happy to share this gsheet link with the hierarchy outline and org structure, and feel free to reach out if you'd like additional context! --ParkerBrothers (talk) 17:56, 4 August 2023 (CEST)