Talk:Pentel Sharp P200: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:48, 8 July 2018

#1 claim

I think the #1 claim needs some qualification and clarification. I note the Pentel UK and USA websites state something about it being #1, but Pentel Japan discontinued it many years ago presumably due to poor sales. KDMP (talk) 08:27, 8 July 2018 (CEST)

I agree. This sounds like a typical marketing claim to me. I am sure it is #1 when measured in one or more ways, but it would be good to know based on what it is #1 and to have a reference. --Memm (talk) 22:48, 8 July 2018 (CEST)

Name of series

I think the P20x series has different numbers depending on lead diameter, e.g. 5 for 0.5, 7 for 0.7.. Is there an official name for the P20x series? If so that might be a better name for this article. --Memm (talk) 22:48, 8 July 2018 (CEST)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+== #1 claim ==
 I think the #1 claim needs some qualification and clarification.
 I note the Pentel UK and USA websites state something about it being #1, but Pentel Japan discontinued it many years ago presumably due to poor sales.
 [[User:KDMP|KDMP]] ([[User talk:KDMP|talk]]) 08:27, 8 July 2018 (CEST)
+:I agree. This sounds like a typical marketing claim to me. I am sure it is #1 when measured in one or more ways, but it would be good to know based on what it is #1 and to have a reference. --[[User:Memm|Memm]] ([[User talk:Memm|talk]]) 22:48, 8 July 2018 (CEST)
+== Name of series ==
+I think the P20x series has different numbers depending on lead diameter, e.g. 5 for 0.5, 7 for 0.7.. Is there an official name for the P20x series? If so that might be a better name for this article. --[[User:Memm|Memm]] ([[User talk:Memm|talk]]) 22:48, 8 July 2018 (CEST)