Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help using our Wiki
Stationery Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Log in
Personal tools
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
The Pen Addict 51/transcript
(section)
Page
Discussion
British English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
Refresh
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Email Follow Up == '''Brad Dowdy:''' No, I'm just kidding. Okay. We got some follow-up topics. I got a lot of good email this week, so I wanted to go a few things. One of the topics that, you know, after the pen show recap episode last week and my blog posts on the pens I picked up, I got a lot of good emails. And one of them stood out, and I thought it was an awesome email, and it was a really very, very helpful email, which is one of the things I enjoy about doing this podcast and writing the blog is I get to learn so much about things that, you know, I'm not completely experienced with, like fountain pens, especially on the vintage side. So, excuse me, the Parker Vacumatic that I bought at the pen show and how I was raving about how, you know, you could see the amber coloration through the stripes in the barrel and how I just thought that was the coolest thing ever. And it looked beautiful. I mean, it really made the pen for me. And I got an email from a guy named Daniel who is very experienced, you know, purchasing vacuumatics. And he said that's actually not a feature that a hardcore vacuumatic collector looks for. That's actually an unwanted result of, you know, ink staying in the barrel too long and discoloring the inside of the barrel. '''Myke Hurley:''' Oh. '''Brad Dowdy:''' Yeah, so it's not β but unfortunately, I guess for vacuumatic collectors, that's the norm, right, because it's an, you know, 80-, 90-year-old pen or 70-year-old pen. And you almost aren't going to find one that's clear, and those are the ones that bring in lots of money. Like if it was just a regular stripe one and had kind of a clear, more see-through barrel, the less ambering they are, the more collectible it is. So let me β I'll read you his email real quick just so it kind of makes sense to everyone. It says, you may already know this from your research, so forgive me if I'm telling something you already learned. The amber color you see between the stripes is not something original to the pen but something that comes from age and is very, very common with vacuumatics. Originally, when the pen was new, the area between the stripes would have been clear, allowing for you to see the ink sloshing around inside and letting you know how much ink you have left. But depending on how badly ambered the barrel is, you may still be able to see ink inside when you hold the pen up to the light. And the more heavy the ambering, the stronger a light you'll need to see the ink. The ambering you're seeing is not actually desirable to hardcore vacuumatic collectors. Instead, they're looking for vacs that have remained clear all these years, which is pretty rare. So he says, that said, I agree with you that the amber is pretty cool looking. And as someone who is using the pen rather than putting it in a display case, you didn't worry about it at all. It has no impact on the pen's use. And that's it. So I mean I thought that was a pretty β I was really excited to get that email. It's like, oh, man, that's great information to have, right? I mean it doesn't change what I think about the pen because, to be perfectly honest, I wouldn't have bought it if it didn't have that because it probably wouldn't have looked as cool. And it probably would have been three times as expensive or something like that, right?
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Stationery Wiki are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (see
Stationery Wiki:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)